I personally think doing proof books like Velleman or book of proof is pretty useless. They spend a lot on time and pages on stuff you could do way shorter. Why do I think doing proof books is not good?

Foundations Recommended Math books as preparation for. Crack Staad Pro V8i Ss30. Principles of Mathematics, by Allendoerfer. BasicCalculus.pdf Then try Allendoerfer and Oakley. Buy Principles of Mathematics on Amazon.com FREE SHIPPING on qualified orders. Allendoerfer was the author, with Cletus Oakley, of several prominent mathematics textbooks used in the 1. Principles And Standards For Mathematics He was also author of a series of math films. You can download PDF versions of the user's guide, manuals and ebooks about principles of mathematics by allendoerfer and oakley pdf, you can also find and download for free A free online manual (notices) with beginner and intermediate, Downloads Documentation, You can download PDF files (or DOC and PPT) about principles of mathematics by allendoerfer and oakley pdf for free, but please respect copyrighted ebooks.

1) You learn a certain notation and a certain style to do proofs. This is not bad, but the style you learn from proof books tend to be really different from how the rest of mathematics approach their proofs. 2) You learn proofs in isolation. This is really bad, since proofs don't exist in isolation. They always have a certain context (like analysis, or discrete math). Eliminating the context is a really bad idea.

I think you would be better off getting a book on an actual mathematical topic. Sentry Wireless Speaker Manual Ho700 on this page. Keisler is good. I suggest perhaps some linear algebra book, or a discrete math book like Grimaldi.

That would prepare you way better than a proof book. Also, if possible, find somebody who is willing to guide you. This maybe some tutor, or even you posting solutions on physicsforums. But when learning basic proofs, you will NEED feedback. If you don't get feedback, you'll learn it all wrong. I tend to agree that books merely about 'proof' do not prepare one for real math books. Still there are books that try to do both, present rules of logic, then present actual math topics logically.

I was going to suggest one I taught from, Introduction to Mathematical Thinking by Gilbert and Vanstone, until I searched and found it priced at over $100, for a slim paperback worth maybe $15. So I now suggest actually a better book, older and with more mathematical content, but also introducing logic, Principles of Mathematics, by Allendoerfer and Oakley. I liked it in high school and it helped get me ready to major in math in college. But nothing substitutes for just struggling with a real math book. Still this has some actual content. You might just go to a university library and sit in the stacks and browse until you find one that you like. There are some very negative reviews of Gilbert and Vanstone on amazon that make me shake my head and wonder what book would work for those reviewers, so everyone has different needs and different preparation.